Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:899 (3 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39381.375972.BE
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Greenhalgh and Powell1 cite a recent Cochrane review, which reported that screening asymptomatic people for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) significantly reduced not all cause but AAA related mortality in men aged 65-79. The review, however, excluded some recent studies with long follow-up.2 3 4 Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies with long follow-up of screening for AAA in men (both AAA related and all cause mortality).5
Our comprehensive search identified four reports—the Chichester study (over 15 year follow-up),2 the Viborg country study (median 9.6 year follow-up),3 the Western Australia study (median 3.6 year follow-up), and the multicentre aneurysm screening study (mean 7.1 year follow-up).4 Pooled analysis of the four reports showed a statistically significant reduction in AAA related mortality (risk difference –0.25%, 95% confidence interval –0.46% to –0.04%) and all cause mortality (–1.06%, –1.81% to –0.31%) with screening relative to control in a random effects model.5
Thus, our meta-analysis,5
Hisato Takagi, consultant cardiovascular surgeon, Norikazu Kawai, registrar, Takuya Umemoto, consultant cardiovascular surgeon
Shizuoka Medical Centre, Shizuoka 411-8611, Japan
kfgth973@ybb.ne.jp
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+