Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:893-894 (3 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39356.700139.BE (published 4 October 2007)
Evidence suggests a positive effect, but future programmes need rigorous assessment before being expanded
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In this week's BMJ, Mason and colleagues report a cluster randomised controlled trial examining the effects of a "paramedic practitioner" service in a UK urban setting.1 The trial focused on managing older patients without life threatening conditions who accessed the emergency ambulance service. It aimed to increase the proportion receiving care in the community and reduce admissions to the emergency department. It found that people in the intervention group were less likely to attend the emergency department (relative risk 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.75) or need hospital admission within 28 days (0.87, 0.81 to 0.94). However, use of secondary care services after the initial episode increased (1.21, 1.06 to 1.38).
Paramedic practitioners undertook a three week theory course followed by 45 days of supervised clinical experience. Their scope of practice was restricted to common presentations considered unlikely to result in serious injury, including falls, lacerations, epistaxis, and
Malcolm Woollard, professor in prehospital and emergency care
Coventry University, Richard Crossman Building, Coventry CV1 5FB
Malcolm.woollard@coventry.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.