Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:839 (27 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.39374.474965.BE
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
We published the follow-up of the Bristol Royal Infirmary analysis to which Westaby et al refer1 2 and have some comments on their paper.
The online version suggests that the clinical teams did not verify the data. We wrote to the clinical team at Oxford over a year before our paper was published. After some months and a reminder letter sent to them, we received a response from the medical director of the trust which did not dispute our figures. His letter also confirmed that the trust had become aware of a downturn in their results before 2000. This was noted in our paper.
We have previously made clear the limitations of using OPCS4 codes in defining open operations, in that there is no explicit code for open heart surgery. We used a definition arrived at by consultation for the Bristol inquiry.3 Because this definition differs from that used within the
Paul Aylin, clinical reader in epidemiology and public health1, Alex Bottle, lecturer in medical statistics1, Paul Elliott, professor of epidemiology and public health2, Brian Jarman, emeritus professor3
1 Dr Foster Unit at Imperial College, Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, London SW7 2AZ, 2 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London W2 1PG, 3 Dr Foster Unit at Imperial College
p.aylin@imperial.ac.uk
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+