BMJ  2007;335:838 (27 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.39371.523171.80

Editorials

Providing care closer to home

The strategy is popular with patients but questions about cost and quality remain

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The 2006 National Health Service (NHS) white paper, Our health, our care, our say, set out a strategy to provide more services in the community, closer to people's homes.¹ The report of the evaluation has just been published,² along with a report from the specialties involved.³ The strategy was based on international experience that moving care from large hospitals to smaller local sites improves patient satisfaction and outcomes and is more cost effective. The scheme involves new and more integrated care pathways, polyclinics that provide a wide range of diagnostic and therapeutic services,⁴ and renewed investment in community hospitals. Plurality of services, and the system of "payment by results" by which money follows patients, should enhance patient choice and incentivise quality and value.⁵

The white paper included a commitment to evaluate the strategy in 30 "closer to home" demonstration sites in six specialties: dermatology; ear, nose, and throat; general . . . [Full text of this article]

Academic Unit of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2AA

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Economic evaluation of a general practitioner with special interests led dermatology service in primary care

Joanna Coast, Sian Noble, Alison Noble, Sue Horrocks, Oya Asim, Tim J Peters, and Chris Salisbury
BMJ 2005 331: 1444-1449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

From Policy to Implementation

Minoo Irani, et al.
bmj.com, 30 Oct 2007 [Full text]