Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:788 (20 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.39367.432755.BE
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The UK government recognised the need for standardisation in the adventure travel market1 in this year's BS8848 document, which covered the need to provide medical support by a recognised medical practitioner. All was well until the implications of providing medical cover to Americans, among others, was highlighted. Defence unions advise doctors that although they are covered to treat Americans, they are not covered for court cases that arise in North America. (Americans can sue a doctor in America, independent of where the transgression occurred.) The General Medical Council (GMC) advises doctors not to participate in activities without appropriate cover.
However, if a doctor does not treat an American on an expedition, the American participant can sue for racial discrimination and report the doctor to the GMC for improper conduct. The defence unions escape culpability in the eyes of the racial discrimination board as they are not discriminating against Americans but
Sean T Hudson, medical director, expedition medicine
St Paul's Medical Centre, Carlisle, Cumbria CA1 1AA
sean@expeditionmedicine.co.uk