Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:783-784 (20 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.39351.581366.BE
New recommendations should help researchers, journal editors, and readers
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In this week's BMJ, von Elm and colleagues report the STROBE (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) statement, which recommends what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an analytical observational study.1
Observational epidemiology has made an immense contribution to our understanding of the causes and treatment of disease. Numerous causal associations between risks factors and disease have been identified (see box in version on bmj.com). Most of these observations have led to substantial improvements in public health by causing changes in policy or by leading to the development of effective treatments.
|
Observational studies are also essential for effective clinical
Peter M Rothwell, professor of clinical neurology, Meena Bhatia, research fellow
Stroke Prevention Research Unit, University Department of Clinical Neurology, Oxford OX2 6HA
peter.rothwell@clneuro.ox.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses