BMJ  2007;335 (20 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.39371.537755.47

Editor's Choice

Editor's Choice

Subtle signs

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

I was never a part of the boxing debate—at least not in the ring. This was mostly because I like my brain, eyes, and ego, and I believe boxing can damage all of these. The debate, however, is making a comeback in the BMJ. This time it is about amateur boxing and the risk of chronic traumatic brain injury. This week, Mike Loosemore and colleagues report their systematic review of observational studies, which finds no strong evidence of a link (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39342.690220.55). Given the quality of published reports, it is hardly surprising that the evidence is inconclusive, says Paul McCrory in his editorial (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39352.454792.80). He also says that today's amateur boxers are unlikely to sustain the injuries of boxers of a bygone era, because they have relatively shorter careers. And boxing is more regulated today than it ever was.

Today's and tomorrow's boxers could of course . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

74 year old GP refuses to take part in deputising service

Tony Sheldon
BMJ 2007 335: 792. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Acromegaly

Jon Danzig
BMJ 2007 335: 824-825. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Amateur boxing and risk of chronic traumatic brain injury: systematic review of observational studies

Mike Loosemore, Charles H Knowles, and Greg P Whyte
BMJ 2007 335: 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Boxing and the risk of chronic brain injury

Paul McCrory
BMJ 2007 335: 781-782. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]