Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:750 (13 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.39316.399931.94
Andrew Cotgrove, clinical director
Pine Lodge Young People's Centre, Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Chester CH2 1AW
andy.cotgrove@cwpnt.nhs.uk
Depression is disabling a growing proportion of children, but evidence on treatment is disputed. Andrew Cotgrove believes drugs are a vital part of the armoury but Sami Timimi is unconvinced that they are helpful or safe
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder cause considerable distress in young people. These disorders affect emotional, educational, and social development. To deny these vulnerable groups the possibility of receiving antidepressants would be to withhold one of the few evidence based treatments available to them.
There are genuine reasons to question their use. Firstly, much of the evidence has, quite rightly, been strongly criticised in recent years. Secondly, the drugs are associated with appreciable risks, in particular an increase in suicidality. Thirdly, other treatments are available. Nevertheless, the evidence indicates that the benefits of these drugs outweigh the risks when used in the appropriate clinical context. I shall focus on the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) because this is the group of antidepressants for which the evidence in young people is strongest1 and it is the use of these drugs in depression that has been most controversial.
The criticisms of research
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.