BMJ  2007;335:743 (13 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.39363.347338.DB

News

Doctors and officials should not have been charged over infected blood, lawyers say

David Spurgeon

Quebec

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

After four doctors and a US drug company were acquitted in Canada last week of criminal charges relating to the distribution of infected blood products, the doctors' lawyers have said that the case should never have been brought. But patients' groups greeted the acquittal with dismay.

The products infected more than 1000 Canadians with HIV and up to 20 000 with hepatitis C. Events dating back more than 20 years have become known as the nation's worst preventable public health disaster.

On 1 October, after an 18 month trial, Superior Court Justice Mary Lou Benotto acquitted Roger Perrault, former national medical director of the Canadian Red Cross Society, John Furesz and Donald Boucher, former federal health department officials, and Michael Rodell, a former executive of Armour Pharmaceutical. They had been accused of criminal negligence causing bodily harm and of common nuisance endangering the public, after patients were given infected blood . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Canadian Red Cross apologises for distributing HIV infected blood
David Spurgeon
BMJ 2005 330: 1349. [Extract] [Full Text]


What's new
Student BMJ poll

Resources
Tools
Online poll
Find out more
See previous polls
Services

Rapid responses for this article

There are no rapid responses for this article.
Print issues


Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview