BMJ 2007;335:736 (13 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.39360.446528.BE
Letters
CAM
What to do about CAM?
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Doug Kamerow seems excessively tolerant of people who make lots of money out of unproved and disproved treatments.1
I prefer the straight talking of his compatriot, Gerald Weissmann, "If the trend persists, perhaps MIT [Massachusetts Institute of Technology] or Cal Tech will march in step with the medical schools and offer prizes for integrative alchemy or alternative engineering."2 Or Wallace Sampson, "It is time for Congress to defund the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). After ten years of existence and over $200 million in expenditures, it has not proved effectiveness for any alternative' method. It has added evidence of ineffectiveness of some methods that we knew did not work before NCCAM was formed."3
That is something that could be done—the expenditure on NCCAM is now close to $1bn (£0.5bn;
0.7bn).
In the UK National Health Service, primary care trusts are, quite rightly, withdrawing funding from homoeopathy. Tunbridge . . . [Full text of this article]
David Colquhoun, professor of pharmacology
University College London, London WC1E 6BT

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Funding for CAM
- George T Lewith
BMJ 2007 335: 951.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
How much of orthodox medicine is evidence based?
- John S Garrow
BMJ 2007 335: 951.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Evidence is important but should not be the only consideration: patients' and clinicians' views matter too
- David I Tovey
BMJ 2007 335: 952.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
The way of the world
- Tony Delamothe
BMJ 2007 335: 0.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Wham, bam, thank you CAM
- Douglas Kamerow
BMJ 2007 335: 647.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Lewith, G. T
(2007). Funding for CAM. BMJ
335: 951-951
[Full text]
-
Tovey, D. I
(2007). Evidence is important but should not be the only consideration: patients' and clinicians' views matter too. BMJ
335: 952-952
[Full text]
-
Garrow, J. S
(2007). How much of orthodox medicine is evidence based?. BMJ
335: 951-951
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Funding for CAM
- George T Lewith
bmj.com, 15 Oct 2007
[Full text]
- How much of orthodox medicine is EBM?
- John S Garrow
bmj.com, 16 Oct 2007
[Full text]
- Food is live medicine. Medicine is dead food.
- Hugh Mann
bmj.com, 16 Oct 2007
[Full text]
- Using CAM services with Medicine
- Ikhlaq H. Din
bmj.com, 18 Oct 2007
[Full text]
- A misunderstanding?
- George T Lewith
bmj.com, 24 Oct 2007
[Full text]
- What to do about CAM? Let's keep it.
- Jennifer A Boyle
bmj.com, 24 Oct 2007
[Full text]
- Evidence is important but should not be the only consideration
- David I Tovey
bmj.com, 31 Oct 2007
[Full text]
- What to do about CAM? Increase research funding by several factors!
- Helmut Roniger
bmj.com, 3 Nov 2007
[Full text]
- Dilemmas of CAM
- David Colquhoun
bmj.com, 11 Nov 2007
[Full text]