BMJ  2007;335:731-732 (13 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.39350.590625.80

Editorials

Participation in mammography screening

Women should be encouraged to decide what is right for them, rather than being told what to do

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In April 2007, the American College of Physicians—the largest medical specialty society in the United States—issued new guidelines on screening mammography for women aged 40-49. Rather than calling for universal screening, the guidelines recommend that women make an informed decision after learning about the benefits and harms of mammography.1

The last time a major US policy organisation made such a recommendation all hell broke loose. In 1997, a consensus panel of the National Institutes of Health concluded "that the data currently available do not warrant a universal recommendation for mammography for all women in their forties. Each woman should decide for herself whether to undergo mammography." This recommendation generated intense reactions in the press, public, and government.2 Most stories in the press suggested that women should be screened and others directed anger at the panel for "failing" to recommend screening. The panel's chair was summoned before congress, and a US . . . [Full text of this article]

Lisa M Schwartz, associate professor of medicine, Steven Woloshin, associate professor of medicine

VA Outcomes Group (111B), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT 05009, USA

Lisa.Schwartz@Dartmouth.EDU


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study
Sophia Zackrisson, Ingvar Andersson, Lars Janzon, Jonas Manjer, and Jens Peter Garne
BMJ 2006 332: 689-692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey
Lisa M Schwartz, Steven Woloshin, Harold C Sox, Baruch Fischhoff, and H Gilbert Welch
BMJ 2000 320: 1635-1640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

And Women Over 70, over 80?
Joseph More
bmj.com, 12 Oct 2007 [Full text]
False positives donīt result in overdiagnosis
Christian Weymayr
bmj.com, 13 Oct 2007 [Full text]
Additional harms/benefits of screening
Anne Peticolas
bmj.com, 15 Oct 2007 [Full text]
Correction & acknowledgments
Steven Woloshin, et al.
bmj.com, 15 Oct 2007 [Full text]
Patient decision aid is available
Andrew Hutchinson
bmj.com, 15 Oct 2007 [Full text]
Breast Screening and Choice of participation
MOHAMMED S ABSAR
bmj.com, 16 Oct 2007 [Full text]
At last
Michael Baum
bmj.com, 19 Oct 2007 [Full text]
Consenting adults
John Doherty
bmj.com, 26 Oct 2007 [Full text]
FNACor Core Needle biopsy is still the best choice for early dignosis of breast cancer in West Bengal than Mamography as it is cheap, reproducible Early dignosis and of high sensitivity,specificity
Professor Pranab kumar Bhattacharya, et al.
bmj.com, 28 Oct 2007 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview