BMJ  2007;335:723 (6 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.39356.470694.59

Views & reviews

Personal views

Fluoride: a whiter than white reputation?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In 1964, when I was a medical student, Birmingham City Council decided to fluoridate its water supply. Over the weekend that the fluoride was supposed to be added, the Sunday Mirror carried many letters from people who could taste the difference and felt a variety of symptoms. On Monday the Medical Office of Health announced that a technical hitch meant that the fluoride would not in fact be added for another month. There were no further protests.

Thirty years later I was regional director of public health for the West Midlands (which includes Birmingham). From time to time the issue of fluoridation was raised, most often as some sort of scare about cancer, bone fractures, dental fluorosis, or allergies. A little over half of the region was fluoridated, and we knew in some detail which areas had fluoridated water and which did not. We examined every claim made against fluoride, . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Tooth and nail

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2007 335: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Fluoride: a whiter than white reputation?

John Graham
bmj.com, 8 Oct 2007 [Full text]

Fluoride: A Whiter Than White Reputation?

Doris M Jones, MSc
bmj.com, 18 Oct 2007 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>