Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:684 (6 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.39353.489120.BE
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Winyard has missed the issue of non-European Union UK medical graduates.1 These students make up about 15% of medical undergraduates, and UK medical schools depend on their financial backing to survive. Each student would have forked out at least £80 000 (
114 000; $162 000) by year 5, excluding the cost of living. When these students first chose to study in Britain, the rules would have allowed them fair access to postgraduate training.
Since April 2006, with the abolition of permit-free training, these students—many with 10 times the debt of local students—are left in limbo, with a strong feeling of breach of moral contract. What I fail to understand is why these non-EU students are included in the figures used by the Department of Health and the Foreign Office when accounting for UK graduates but are judged as "international medical graduates" when applying for jobs.
What people should also
Mohammad Farhad Peerally, fourth year medical student
University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN
mda04mfp@shef.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses