Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:628 (29 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.39346.489583.3A
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
I am struck by the global absence of a debate about health literacy in achieving health equity for all.1 Patients (users) in all countries have a right to information about health. This is enshrined in the constitution of the World Health Organization of 1946. If we are to share our knowledge we need to share a common language. Up to now advocates of health literacy have suggested we remove technical language—a sort of dumbing down.
I propose that we give up our hold on medical information and make it available to all from primary school on—this would entail a massive effort by government, medics, and educationalists to re-package the information, but it's worth looking at. By doing this we would be educating children about the social, political, geographical, and "medical" (infectious, degenerative, etc) causes of disease, and we would be altering presently dry subject areas such as history, geography, and
Hugh van't Hoff, GP and educationalist
May Lane Surgery, Dursley, Gloucestershire GL11 4JN
clogs@doctors.org.uk