Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:625-626 (29 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.39336.629271.BE
Claims of increased risk in these groups are not supported by evidence
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Physician assisted death (both voluntary active euthanasia and physician assisted suicide) has been openly practised in the Netherlands for more than 25 years and formally legalised since 2002. The practice has been analysed in four major national studies between 1990 and 2007.1 2 A more restricted form of physician assisted death (physician assisted suicide only) was legalised in Oregon in 1997 and is the subject of an annual report (www.oregon.gov/DHS/ph/pas/index.shtml). Although these studies do little to resolve the moral and religious questions surrounding these practices, they do answer the following questions about the risks and benefits of legalisation.
Will these practices become more common over time in a permissive environment? In Oregon, physician assisted death accounts for around one in 1000 deaths each year, with no significant change in frequency over nine years. All patients have met the necessary criteria, and more than 85% were also enrolled in hospice programmes. In
Timothy E Quill, professor of medicine, psychiatry and medical humanities
University of Rochester School of Medicine, Box 601, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
timothy_quill@urmc.rochester.edu
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+