Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:535 (15 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.39335.652488.DB
Nick Timmins
Financial Times
Closing a hospital always generates a public outcry, even if the evidence suggests that closure will improve services. Nicholas Timmins asks why it's so difficult
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The Tory MP Kenneth Clarke used to tell a story, when health minister back in the 1980s, of meeting his Italian counterpart, who complained vigorously about the difficulty of closing hospitals, when rationalisation of health services was badly needed in his own country.
"We don't have a problem," Ken chortled. "We just close them." And, at the simplest level, that is clearly true. In the United Kingdom numerous hospitals have closed or merged with their neighbours over the past 40 years. The exact number is hard to pin down because of the frequency of mergers. But the number of beds has certainly decreased: back in 1948, when the NHS was founded, the UK had around 550 000 beds; today the figure is half that, at around 228 000 in 2003-4.
True, the great bulk of that reduction is due to the closure of the old mental health asylums and the
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?