Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:534 (15 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.39332.615718.DB
Lynn Eaton
London
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The National Audit Office should carry out a full independent investigation of the cost to the taxpayer of the medical training application service (MTAS), the flawed computerised system used this year to appoint junior doctors to training posts in the UK, says the BMA.
Andrew Rowland, vice chairman of the BMA's Junior Doctors Committee, says in a letter to the National Audit Office that it's not just the reported £1.9m (
2.8m; $3.9m) paid to an IT company to set up an online recruitment system that needs to be investigated. He says the potential hidden costs to the tax payer should be looked at as well. These may include the continuing costs of using MTAS to collect data, he says, and of the extra interviews that had to be arranged after the system was abandoned.
"We know that thousands of doctors have had their careers messed up, that many of
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?