Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:529 (15 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.39336.545336.80
Zosia Kmietowicz
London
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Greater spending on the NHS over the past five years, by more than £43bn (
63bn; $87bn), has failed to deliver improvements in productivity that could have led to better health care for all, an independent review has concluded.
The review by Derek Wanless, which has been carried out for the independent health think tank the King's Fund, follows up his 2002 report Securing Our Future Health (BMJ 2002;324:998 doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7344.998), which was commissioned by Gordon Brown, then Chancellor of the Exchequer.
Although the extra spending on the NHS has led to many important improvements in healthcare infrastructure, staffing levels, and care provided for some conditions, the new report says, the opportunity to deliver better public health has been missed—with the prevalence of obesity in particular now higher than the worst case scenario forecast in the 2002 report.
"The extra resources, accompanied by fundamental reform, have undoubtedly improved
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses