BMJ  2007;335:528 (15 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.39332.450995.3A

Letters

Time to drop eponyms?

Curbing Medicalese is the issue

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Blanket abandonment of eponyms cannot be argued successfully.^{1 2} Surely the real question is whether Medicalese (including excessive use of eponyms) should be abandoned; or at least brought to heel.

The scholarly dandification of the English language by post-renaissance travellers around the 16th and 17th centuries AD included the absorption and reworking of classical terms from Greek and Latin. This represented an inversion of the hard won earlier rejection of Latin as the exclusive language of knowledge and power, mediated at that time through the clergy. As such, this new tendency (with flourishing sciences such as medicine among the prime movers) was much criticised by linguists of the day. However, it continued apace until English had once again become a useful way of distinguishing educated from ignorant, and rich from poor.

Language is a tool for communication. Corrupting its function for reasons of smug scholarly vanity, professional protectionism, or simple laziness . . . [Full text of this article]

Fan Gorau Unit, Montgomery County Infirmary, Powys Local Health Board, Newtown, Powys SY16 2LT

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Should eponyms be abandoned? Yes

Alexander Woywodt and Eric Matteson
BMJ 2007 335: 424. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Should eponyms be abandoned? No

Judith A Whitworth
BMJ 2007 335: 425. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Online poll

Find out more >>