BMJ  2007;335:465 (8 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.39325.433241.3A

Letters

Unholy trinity

Public trust in doctors undented

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The BMA does not take public trust in doctors for granted nor does it underestimate the potential for adverse reactions from the public or patients to events such as Bristol and Alder Hey.1 Accordingly, it has commissioned regular research via MORI on the issue and did so at intervals during the 1980s and 1990s and on an annual basis between 1999 and 2005. The findings support a conclusion of ongoing trust and belief in medical competence, with little deviation even at times of highly adverse publicity.

The public was asked whether it trusted a variety of professions and occupations to tell the truth. The figure (top)Go shows the findings for doctors over time. An additional question asked from 1999 to 2003 explicitly prompted respondents over negative publicity on doctors and asked whether in the light of this doctors did a good job. In 2000 specific reference was made to Bristol . . . [Full text of this article]

Jon Ford, head, Health Policy and Economic Research

BMA, London WC1H 9JP

jford@bma.org.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Patchiness at the BMA
William G Pickering.
bmj.com, 11 Sep 2007 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ