Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:359-360 (25 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.39296.711563.AD
UK needs to reorganise services to follow the example of other countries
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The outcome of stroke varies markedly between countries. A study of 12 centres in seven European countries found that mortality varied twofold even when adjusted for case mix and use of healthcare resources.1 Similar variation was also found in two large international multicentre trials of acute stroke.2 3 All three studies found the outcome was worst in the United Kingdom; in one study the differences in the proportion of patients dead or dependent between the UK and the other eight countries were between 150 and 300 events per 1000 patients.2
What underlies this variation and why is outcome so poor in the UK compared with countries with similar economies in western Europe? Residual confounding by case mix is difficult to exclude completely, but differences in the process of care are likely to be important.3 In many European countries stroke care is an integral part of neurology. In contrast, in the UK
Hugh Markus, professor
Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, St George's University of London, London SW17 0RE
hmarkus@sgul.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+