Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:322 (18 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.39304.603762.DB
Janice Hopkins Tanne
New York
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The US Food and Drug Administration needs more funding to do its job, say two articles in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) related to reports of an increased cardiovascular risk associated with rosiglitazone (marketed as Avandia), used to treat type 2 diabetes.
Earlier this year the FDA placed its most serious "black box" warnings on rosiglitazone, which is made by GlaxoSmithKline, and pioglitazone (Actos), made by Takeda, saying that they increased the risk of congestive heart failure (BMJ 2007;334:1237 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39244.394456.DB).
Clifford Rosen, who chaired the FDA advisory committee that looked into the drug, has written a commentary in the NEJM (doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078167). "The basic plot of the rosiglitazone story quickly became obvious to the . . . committee: a new wonder drug,' approved prematurely and for the wrong reasons by a weakened and underfunded government agency subjected to pressure from industry, had
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?