Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:317 (18 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.39303.688611.3A
| The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below. |
I am a forensic physician working in the east end of Glasgow, and I write with reference to the debate by Burns and Shaw.1 2 A high percentage of detainees are on opiate substitution programmes. From my own personal observations, nearly all are using "top-up" heroin.
Additionally, alcohol consumption while receiving methadone treatment is high. It is obvious that a £2 shopping voucher could easily be diverted into paying for two litres of cider to fund a dual addiction.
I also find it ridiculous in a cash strapped NHS service, where we are unable to fund life saving or life extending medications, we are able to pay addicts to "comply" with a treatment that offers no treatment benefit other than to "reduce harm."
Richard J Stevenson, forensic physician
Strathclyde Police, Glasgow G40 3RX
rjstevenson_fme@ntlworld.com
Read all Rapid Responses