BMJ  2007;335:284 (11 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.39297.609421.94

Observations

Body politic

How not to win friends and influence people

The debacle concerning the UK medical training application service (MTAS) has flushed out what people really think of the Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

As the MTAS shenanigans have emerged it has been interesting to discover how many organisations and individuals are not responsible for it. Failure is an orphan, they say, but seldom such a threadbare and friendless waif as this.

Foremost among those who deny any responsibility is the government organisation charged with the higher training of doctors, the Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board. Let's count the number of words in its name that relate to the issues affected by MTAS: education, postgraduate, training, medical. That only leaves "board" unaccounted for.

The board was supposed to bring organisation and method to the often haphazard arrangements for postgraduate education and training of doctors. In evidence to the High Court in the case brought by the campaigning group Remedy UK, the board acknowledged that it was responsible for laying down the basic principles of recruitment to specialist training posts. But its chairman, Peter . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

How not to do things

Rajendra Kale
BMJ 2007 335: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

PMETB and the future of "the lost tribe"

Chris M Laing
bmj.com, 13 Aug 2007 [Full text]