Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:272 (11 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.39296.743391.3A
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Ham points out the importance of the choices the government makes around failing hospitals.1 Almost every proposed reconfiguration will provoke local opposition from the people who live next door to the hospital. But what should matter for serious decision makers is not the views of the IMBYs (everyone wants a hospital "in my back yard") but a rational standard of provision. For example, we might try to maintain general hospital levels of service in a certain travel time of the population (with perhaps a much less stringent limit for services that require substantial critical mass).
But this sort of analysis is rarely seen in the context of reconfiguration. For England we recently found that if we set an acceptable access standard of 30 minutes' travel by road (actually quite a stringent target) we find that about 7% of the English population have no provision (this is mostly the rural fringes),
Stephen Black, management consultant
London SW1W 9SR
stephen.black@paconsulting.com
Read all Rapid Responses