BMJ  2007;335:267-268 (11 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.39293.453090.AD

Editorials

Fast track referral for cancer

Has not improved patient outcomes in the UK

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Most patients with cancer who are not diagnosed by screening will be diagnosed after symptoms develop, so timely referral of patients to specialists is essential. In this week's BMJ Potter and colleagues assess the long term impact of the "two week wait" rule in the United Kingdom for breast cancer on referral patterns, diagnoses of cancer, and waiting times.1 Their study found that the diagnosis of cancer in people referred within two weeks significantly decreased in the period 1999-2005 (12.8% v 7.7%, P<0.001) and diagnoses in people referred through the routine route increased (2.5% v 5.3%, P<0.001). The study suggests that the current cancer referral policy in the UK—whereby patients with a given set of symptoms are seen within two weeks—results in more patients who have cancer being seen on routine waiting lists than on the fast track list. This means diagnosis is delayed even further. Why is this so, . . . [Full text of this article]

Moyez Jiwa, professor of primary care1, Christobel Saunders, professor of surgical oncology2

1 WA Centre for Cancer and Palliative Care, Health Research Campus, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia, 2 School of Surgery and Pathology, QEII Medical Centre, Perth, WA 6009

Correspondence to: M Jiwa m.jiwa@curtin.edu.au


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Breast cancer experience has wider implications
S Michael Crawford
BMJ 2007 335: 361. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Referral patterns, cancer diagnoses, and waiting times after introduction of two week wait rule for breast cancer: prospective cohort study
Shelley Potter, Sasi Govindarajulu, Mike Shere, Fiona Braddon, Geoffrey Curran, Rosemary Greenwood, Ajay K Sahu, and Simon J Cawthorn
BMJ 2007 335: 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed "mindlines?" Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care
John Gabbay and Andrée le May
BMJ 2004 329: 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Crawford, S M. (2007). Breast cancer experience has wider implications. BMJ 335: 361-361 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

For Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread
Dr. Herbert H. Nehrlich
bmj.com, 14 Aug 2007 [Full text]
Breast cancer experience and wider implications for referrals policies
S. Michael Crawford
bmj.com, 13 Aug 2007 [Full text]
Two week rule too weak
David A Gorard
bmj.com, 14 Aug 2007 [Full text]
Fools who don't rush in when death is very preventable
benjamin dean
bmj.com, 16 Aug 2007 [Full text]
Disappointing leader
Wilfrid Treasure
bmj.com, 17 Aug 2007 [Full text]
inaccurate impression of British GPs
GORDON FERGUSON
bmj.com, 18 Aug 2007 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ