Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:183 (28 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39286.704722.59
Iona Heath, general practitioner
London
iona.heath@dsl.pipex.com
Why have successive governments been intent on undermining the morale and status of general practitioners?
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The UK National Health Service is designed as an expression of social solidarity and provides universal access to health care funded through general taxation and free at the time of need. Similar systems have been developed across the Nordic countries and elsewhere but, despite frequent statements of support from all mainstream political parties, all such systems now find themselves under grave threat. Rapid advances in biomedical science are producing exponential increases in the costs and sophistication of investigations and treatments. Politicians everywhere, undoubtedly reflecting the priorities of their electorates, are unwilling to increase levels of taxation to match these increasing costs. This reluctance is easy to understand, but the identification of market forces as a solution to the worsening tension is extremely perplexing.
Markets are motivated by the pursuit of private profit. This motivation can be used to increase efficiency and hold down wages but markets can thrive only if
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses