Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:172 (28 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39283.399907.1F
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
It is not only journal editors who need to take leadership in changing the culture of acceptance of drug advertising1 2: medical schools also need to recognise their responsibility.
Medical schools are to be commended for integrating many of the principles of evidence based medicine into their curriculums. However, when it comes to teaching about the ethics of marketing there is much to be done: to our knowledge, no British medical school has a policy on pharmaceutical interaction.
Our American counterparts are setting the standard: Yale, Stanford, and many other American medical schools have policies restricting pharmaceutical interaction during medical school.3 Their policies reflect the value of marketing representatives as a source of evidence.
The BMA's recent annual representatives' meeting signalled the beginnings of a cultural shift in the United Kingdom. The meeting voted almost unanimously in favour of supporting medical schools in not only forming policies but dedicating time
David Biles, year 4 medical student, Patrick Howlett, year 4 medical student, Robert Hughes, year 4 medical student
University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol BS2 8DZ
db2065@bris.ac.uk