Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335 (28 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39287.684086.80
Fiona Godlee, editor, BMJ
fgodlee@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In his report on the nation's health (BMJ 2007;335:113 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39280.523657.4E), England's chief medical officer Liam Donaldson calls for presumed consent for organ donation. The BMA has long campaigned for such a system, and to this we can add the weight of the BMJ and its readers. Independence from the BMA (last week's editor's choice doi: 10.1136/bmj.39280.634977.47) means we sometimes usefully concur. Our head to head on 26 May asked whether presumed consent was the answer to organ shortages (BMJ 2007;334:1088 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39199.475301.AD; BMJ 2007;334:1089 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39199.475301.AD). While the arguments against were interesting, those in favour were convincing, and most readers who responded to our poll (although our smallest turnout yet) were in favour.
As I write, someone I know is preparing to donate a kidney to a friend. What's astounding about this is not only her generosity and courage but the fact that
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.