Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:160 (21 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39276.621065.34
Ike Iheanacho, editor, Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin
iiheanacho@bmjgroup.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Having produced a new treatment, drug companies take great care to avoid testing it too exhaustively in patients. Now, such an assertion would provoke howls of protest from the drug industry, which would no doubt point out just how much clinical research it does (lots) and contrast this with the amount of non-industry development of new drugs (very little).
While some of this counter-argument is half true, it doesn't alter the fact that too much essential information about many new drugs is missing when these products appear on the market. A simple demonstration of this fact involves subjecting examples of new drugs to two simple questions. Firstly, have they been directly compared with standard comparator treatments in appropriately designed trials? Secondly, does the available research allow confident prediction of the effects (both helpful and harmful) of the drugs in patients from the general population, particularly in the long term? The
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses