BMJ  2007;335:129-131 (21 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39203.430984.AD

Analysis

Uncertainty in classification of repeat sudden unexpected infant deaths in Care of the Next Infant programme

C J Bacon, retired paediatrician, West Yorkshire Braithwaite, E N Hey, retired paediatrician

Northallerton, North Yorkshire

Correspondence to: C J Bacon Chrisjbacon@googlemail.com

It is misleading to classify every unexplained infant death as natural if no unnatural cause has been established, argue C J Bacon and E N Hey

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Sudden unexpected infant death (cot death) has become much less common in recent years, and it is rare for a family to experience two such deaths. Carpenter and colleagues recently published valuable data on the repeat deaths that occurred among 5229 families in the Care of the Next Infant programme.1 This voluntary scheme funded by the Foundation for the Study of Infant Deaths provides extra support to families in England and Wales who have had a cot death and now have a new baby. There were 48 sudden unexpected deaths among babies on the programme between 1988 and 1999, including two third deaths. After examining all the circumstances and postmortem findings of the 46 second deaths, the authors concluded that all but six of the babies died from natural causes. This contrasts with earlier studies by Emery2 and Wolkind and colleagues,3 which concluded that a much higher proportion of repeat . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Special report adds nothing new, say paper authors
R G Carpenter, A Waite, R C Coombs, C Daman-Willems, A McKenzie, and J Huber
BMJ 2007 334: 7. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Was message of sudden infant death study misleading?
Jonathan Gornall
BMJ 2006 333: 1165-1168. [Full Text] [PDF]

Debate on cot death
J L Emery, Alison J Waite, C J Bacon, Peter Reder, and Sylvia Duncan
BMJ 2000 320: 310. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Bacon, C J, Hall, D B M, Stephenson, T J, Campbell, M J (2008). How common is repeat sudden infant death syndrome?. Arch. Dis. Child. 93: 323-326 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Stephenson, T. (2007). Safeguarding children is everyone's responsibility: UK government statement on the duties of doctors. Arch. Dis. Child. 92: 833-834 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Sudden Infant Death Explained.
Michael D Innis
bmj.com, 26 Jul 2007 [Full text]
Re: Sudden Infant Death Explained.
Raymond G Holder
bmj.com, 26 Jul 2007 [Full text]
Re: Re: Sudden Infant Death Explained.
Michael D Innis
bmj.com, 27 Jul 2007 [Full text]
Re: uncertainty in classification of repeat sudden unexpected infant deaths in Care of Next Infant programme
Robert G. Carpenter, et al.
bmj.com, 3 Aug 2007 [Full text]
Adverse reaction to vaccine as a category in cot death
Lisa C Blakemore-Brown
bmj.com, 20 Aug 2007 [Full text]
Uncertainty in classification of repeat sudden unexpected deaths
Christopher Bacon, et al.
bmj.com, 20 Aug 2007 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ