BMJ  2007;335:113 (21 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39279.396273.BE

News

Doctors attack Gordon Brown's plans to regulate medical profession

Michael Day

London

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Doctors' leaders and legal experts say that government plans to lower the level of proof needed to convict doctors of professional misconduct are unfair and probably unworkable.

Gordon Brown, the prime minister, last week announced details of a new Health and Social Care Bill, which will be introduced in the next parliament. At the heart of the bill will be a shake-up of the regulation of the medical profession.

The proposed reorganisation was announced by the chief medical officer, Liam Donaldson, a year ago (BMJ 2006;333:163, doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7560.163). He proposed that key aspects of the General Medical Council's regulatory role would be diminished. The council would no longer act as prosecutor, judge, and jury in cases concerning doctors' fitness to practise. Instead it would be responsible solely for assessment and investigation; an independent tribunal would determine guilt or innocence.

Most controversial, however, was the proposal that the burden . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

England to consider shake-up of medical regulation
Andrew Cole
BMJ 2006 333: 163. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

What is the BMA's objections based on - principles of democracy ?
Anton E Joseph
bmj.com, 23 Jul 2007 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ