Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335 (21 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39281.508345.47
Douglas Kamerow, US editor
dkamerow@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
With the pace of new research, sometimes I feel like the title of a favorite comedy album of my youth performed by the Firesign Theatre: Everything you know is wrong (still funny, by the way, and available at http://laughstore.stores.yahoo.net/firtheatseze.html). This week's BMJ makes me wonder whether some of my cherished medical beliefs still deserve my fidelity.
Everyone knows that all patients with diabetes should monitor their blood glucose levels, right? Maybe not. Andrew Farmer and colleagues randomized 453 patients with type 2 diabetes well controlled on diet alone or oral agents into three groups (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39247.447431.BE). One group received usual care without blood glucose self monitoring, one performed self monitoring with a less intensive clinical intervention, and the third did self monitoring with more intensive clinical assistance. After 12 months, there were no significant differences in HbA1c levels among the three groups. In a related editorial, Simon Heller
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses