Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:60 (14 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39269.437176.DE
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
McDonald et al's report of general practitioners' and nurses' views of the quality and outcomes framework (QOF) highlights the "box ticking" nature of this pay-for-performance contract.1 We have therefore proposed that incentives are linked more directly to positive health outcomes.
Rotherham practices achieved highly on the smoking related QOF indicators in both 2005 and 2006, costing the primary care trust (PCT), which has a population of 250 000, about £276 000 in 2005 and £500 000 in 2006. Despite this, the smoking prevalence among those on Rotherham's QOF chronic disease registers remained essentially unchanged.
We have proposed to the PCT executive and the local medical committee that the QOF contract be renegotiated. We suggested for the smoking related indicators that the four week quit target set for us as a PCT is allocated proportionally between practices; then, at year end, practices are rewarded a proportion of the 68 QOF points
Mark Strong, clinical lecturer, John Radford, director of public health
Rotherham Primary Care Trust, Rotherham S66 1YY
m.strong@nhs.net
Read all Rapid Responses