BMJ  2007;335:53 (14 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39266.662928.BE

Editorials

The future of the medical profession

Depends on professional unity and respectful dialogue between the government and the profession

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

This year marks the 175th anniversary of the BMA. The association has been centrally involved in the evolution and stewardship of the medical profession and has made contributions to national and international health that go far beyond its role as a representative and negotiating body. It has had an important role in debates on abortion, euthanasia, global conflict and the proliferation of nuclear weapons, AIDS, genetics in medicine, and human rights. It must also take a good deal of the credit for the present ban on smoking¹ and, of course, for this journal.

The BMA took a highly conservative and aggressive stance against Bevin's plans for the National Health Service (NHS) in the 1940s, but 50 years later found itself almost in step with the health departments after the abolition of the internal market. However, this sense of common purpose is now much more difficult to discern.

The BMA has . . . [Full text of this article]

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, KCL School of Medicine, London SE11 6SP

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Sticking to standards, not together

Caroline Mawer and Douglas Russell
BMJ 2007 335: 465. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Is the BMJ fit for purpose?

Oliver R Dearlove
BMJ 2007 335: 318. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

The future role of the Department of Health

Rudolf Klein
BMJ 2007 335: 2-3. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Mawer, C., Russell, D. (2007). Sticking to standards, not together. BMJ 335: 465-465 [Full text]  
• Dearlove, O. R (2007). Is the BMJ fit for purpose?. BMJ 335: 318-318 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Why are we here?

Neville W Goodman
bmj.com, 13 Jul 2007 [Full text]

Hear hear!

Douglas A Holden
bmj.com, 16 Jul 2007 [Full text]

Is the BMA fit for purpose?

Jayaprakash Ayillath Gosalakkal
bmj.com, 17 Jul 2007 [Full text]

Is the BMJ [fit for purpose} ?

Oliver R Dearlove
bmj.com, 7 Aug 2007 [Full text]

Brown’s Bonds - the new approach.

Anton E Joseph
bmj.com, 30 Jul 2007 [Full text]

Professionalism is alive and well

Ian T Gilmore, et al.
bmj.com, 30 Jul 2007 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>