Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:8 (7 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39262.446192.3A
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
We have seen some paradigm shifts in managing health inequalities1 in the past decade, which coincided with the Labour government taking power in 1997. However, the recent publication of England's health profile still shows marked inequalities in health between the north and south in England.2 Despite the government's commitment to public health, financial resources that were earmarked for Choosing Health initiatives went into balancing primary care trusts' budgets. This is in parallel with unprecedented financial and political investments in the "choice" agenda despite evidence from a major national research programme funded by the Department of Health that it merely maintains the inequality divide and does nothing to address quality of health services and health outcomes.3 In fact, when it comes to "choice," less is more.4
It is about time that we challenged politicians on the shameful waste of recourses on initiatives of dubious value such as Choose and Book and
Richard Ma, general practitioner
Village Practice, London N7 7JJ
richard.ma@btinternet.com