Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:7 (7 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39262.476921.3A
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In Norway, through our work in a general practice research committee under the Norwegian Medical Association, we have been involved in a voluntary arrangement with pharmaceutical companies where we evaluate research projects initiated by the industry and recruit general practitioners to find patients.1 Our committee makes recommendations to Norwegian general practitioners about whether a project is a real research project rather than marketing camouflaged as research.
However, after we criticised some projects in 2001, this arrangement has been largely boycotted by the industry. One objection in one particular project was that the protocol favoured the company's own drug. We also maintained that exaggerated demands for statistical power led to a grossly overestimated number of people participating. Research ethics should safeguard that type 2 error is prevented, but statistical power beyond reasonable limits (95% or greater power), leads to research where almost any difference reaches significance. According to our view, this
Knut A Holtedahl, professor1, Eivind Meland, professor2
1 Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway, 2 University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
knutarne.holtedahl@ism.uit.no