Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:4-5 (7 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39245.491169.BE
Is effective, but integration with existing sexual health services remains the biggest challenge
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Three randomised controlled trials consistently show that medically performed male circumcision can reduce the acquisition of HIV infection in men by at least 50%.1 2 3 In east Africa and southern Africawhere rates of new HIV infections are high and circumcision rates are lowmodelling studies estimate that circumcision could reduce the incidence of HIV in men by 50-60%.4 5 Clearly, the size of this effect would be determined by uptake. If uptake were 100%, an estimated 2 million new infections and 0.3 million deaths in sub-Saharan Africa would be averted over 10 years, and up to 5.7 million new infections would be averted over 20 years.6 In a setting like Orange Farm in South Africa where one of the trials was performed,1 a 50% uptake of male circumcision could avert 32 000-53 000 new infections over 20 years. Conclusions about the effect of male circumcision on the acquisition of HIV in women are
Quarraisha Abdool Karim, associate scientific director
Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Congella 4013, South Africa
abdoolq2@ukzn.ac.za
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+