Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:18-19 (7 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39261.449097.AD (published 28 June 2007)
Nick Timmins, public policy editor
Financial Times, London
Nick.Timmins@FT.com
As Gordon Brown takes over from Tony Blair as prime minister, Nick Timmins speculates on what he might have in store for the NHS
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Day to day most doctors, nurses, managers, and other NHS staff carry on with what they do best: treating patients and trying to make sure the service works. But among policy makers, politicians, NHS trade associations, trade unions, and those with financial and managerial responsibility for the service, the focus right now is elsewhere, and on only one question. What will Gordon Brown's arrival as prime minister mean for the NHS?
The short answer is that no one knows. Perhaps, at this point, not even Gordon Brown himself. Despite the fact that the NHS now consumes almost a fifth of all public spending, the service is not something to which he has devoted a lot of time over his decade as chancellor.
To be sure, he has been deeply involved in the really big issue: how much money the NHS should receive. It might have been Tony Blair who announced
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?