BMJ  2007;335:1-2 (7 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39262.506528.47

Editorials

Liquid based cytology in cervical cancer screening

Is as sensitive as conventional cytology, and has other advantages

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Cervical screening has been shown to reduce the incidence of cervical cancer, but only in the setting of well organised, high quality programmes. In the United Kingdom the NHS cervical screening programme has been estimated to prevent around 80% of deaths from cervical cancer.¹

Liquid based cytology represents the first major change in preparation method for cervical screening samples for over 50 years. Instead of cells being smeared onto a glass slide, they are washed into a vial of liquid and filtered, and a random sample is presented in a thin layer on a glass slide. These slides can then either be screened by skilled staff or subjected to partially automated imaging. The process is being widely used in the United States, many European countries, and elsewhere.

In this week's BMJ two studies compare the accuracy of liquid based cytology with conventional cytology.^{2 3} The randomised trial by Ronco and colleagues . . . [Full text of this article]

Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

New types of Paps and puffs

Douglas Kamerow
BMJ 2007 335: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomised controlled trial

Guglielmo Ronco, Jack Cuzick, Paola Pierotti, Maria Paola Cariaggi, Paolo Dalla Palma, Carlo Naldoni, Bruno Ghiringhello, Paolo Giorgi-Rossi, Daria Minucci, Franca Parisio, Ada Pojer, Maria Luisa Schiboni, Catia Sintoni, Manuel Zorzi, Nereo Segnan, and Massimo Confortini
BMJ 2007 335: 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Accuracy of reading liquid based cytology slides using the ThinPrep Imager compared with conventional cytology: prospective study

Elizabeth Davey, Jefferson d'Assuncao, Les Irwig, Petra Macaskill, Siew F Chan, Adele Richards, and Annabelle Farnsworth
BMJ 2007 335: 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Nutt, D. J., Sharpe, M. (2008). Uncritical positive regard? Issues in the efficacy and safety of psychotherapy. J Psychopharmacol 22: 3-6  
• Linos, E., Linos, E., Colditz, G. (2007). Screening programme evaluation applied to airport security. BMJ 335: 1290-1292 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

It's the samping, stupid

Paul A O'Brien
bmj.com, 21 Jul 2007 [Full text]