Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335 (7 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39267.396667.43
Douglas Kamerow, US editor
dkamerow@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In the US liquid-based cytology for cervical screening has replaced conventional cytology in many settings. Although there has been a lot of research on the liquid-based technology, few randomized trials have appeared. Two studies, an editorial, and a commentary in this issue add to the confidence that a move to liquid-based techniques is of both clinical and programmatic benefit.
Guglielmo Ronco and colleagues randomized over 45 000 women to receive either conventional or liquid based cytology (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39196.740995.BE). They found that the liquid technique clearly reduced the number of unsatisfactory smears with no decrease in sensitivity, although the number of false positives was increased. Liquid cytology also allows for human papillomavirus testing, which conventional smears do not.
In a prospective analysis of over 55 000 split sample pairs, Elizabeth Davey and associates found an increased sensitivity with the automated reading that is possible with liquid-based cytology compared with conventional
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?