Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:1352-1354 (30 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39218.404201.94
M Hamill, specialist registrar1, K Burgoine, medical student2, F Farrell, medical student2, J Hemelaar, medical student2, G Patel, medical student2, D E Welchew, medical student2, H W Jaffe, professor3
1 Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Mortimer Market Centre, Camden Primary Care Trust, London, 2 University of Oxford Clinical School, Oxford, 3 Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF
Correspondence to: H W Jaffe, Harold.jaffe@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
M Hamill and colleagues believe the UK could do more to ensure people know their HIV status
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The diagnosis of HIV infection is the point of entry to prevention and treatment services. Yet many people are unaware that they are infected. The estimated proportion of people who remain undiagnosed ranges from 90% in sub-Saharan Africa, to one third in the United Kingdom, and a quarter in the United States.1 2 3 The Secretary General of the United Nations declared in 2006 that "Countries should promote, through global and national campaigns, the ideal that each person knows his or her HIV status and has access to AIDS information, counselling and related services, in a social and legal environment that is supportive and safe for confidential testing and voluntary disclosure of HIV status."4 We consider how the UK should respond to this challenge.
HIV tests are usually done as part of diagnosisin patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of HIV disease or to screen for infection in people without symptoms. Most
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses