Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:1335-1336 (30 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39254.924641.1F
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Collins et al and the accompanying editorial conclude that contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a viable alternative to conventional contrast angiography for assessing patients with peripheral arterial disease before treatment.1 2 The authors found an adverse event rate of up to 10% associated with contrast enhanced MRA, lower than other techniques and generally mild compared with conventional contrast angiography.
We draw attention to the association between the use of gadolinium based contrast agents for MRA and the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis,3 a newly described chronic, debilitating disease characterised by progressive fibrosis of the skin, heart, lungs and pleura with considerable morbidity and mortality. Development is predominately restricted to patients with stage V chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 15 ml/min) and in those with acute renal failure, especially with liver failure. Most cases have been associated with the use of gadodiamide (Omniscan), some with gadopentate
Peter C Thomson, research fellow in nephrology1, Tara A Collidge, specialist registrar1, Patrick B Mark, specialist registrar2, Jamie P Traynor, specialist registrar2
1 Renal Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF, 2 Renal Unit, Western Infirmary, Glasgow G11 6PE
peter.thomson@northglasgow.scot.nhs.uk
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.