Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:1302-1304 (23 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39238.447338.AD
Tony Jefferis, associate postgraduate dean
Oxford Deanery Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, Oxford OX3 7LP
afjefferis@uk-consultants.co.uk
The chaos surrounding the UK's centralised application service led to the system being abandoned. Tony Jefferis examines how similar systems work elsewhere
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The UK Medical Training Application Service (MTAS) for specialist training had a bad start. Doctors were angry at its inefficiencies and unfairness.1 2 Many reasons were cited for its problems including using an untried system,3 using the same system for new entrants as for those already committed to a specialty, underestimating the numbers of international medical graduates applying, using a flawed computer system, and, finally, buckling to public outcry by revising the timetable and conditions of application. The secretary of state for health apologised in the House of Commons, the website closed for a security review, and the system was eventually abandoned.
Despite all this, a central application portal with local selection has considerable merit. It has been used successfully in the United States, Canada, and, in a modified form, in Australia and New Zealand for at least 30 years (box). It provides an orderly and transparent way for candidates to
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses