Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:1300 (23 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39252.407350.68
Rebecca Coombes asks key players involved in the medical training application service (MTAS) what they would have done differently
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
What is your connection to MTAS?
The royal colleges, presidents of which are members of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, provided the person specifications against which the candidates for specialty training should be judged.
What would you go back and change about the system before it was launched?
We would require a demonstration that the application system was capable of enabling full recognition and sound balanced assessment of the qualities sought in candidates for specialist training.
What is your prescription for reforming MTAS into a workable system?
In the long term we need a computerised matching system. But it should not be used until it is adequately piloted and its performance evaluated, any bugs fixed, and the system shown to be totally secure. The shortlisting process also needs to be fixed. The scoring system did not ensure accurate discernment between candidates, and the process was excessively time consuming for
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses