Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:1281-1282 (23 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39247.535532.80
Focusing on women's preferences improves decision making
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Rates of caesarean section are a cause of concern worldwide, although the problems vary according to the setting. In many poor countries, mostly in Africa, where average rates are 2%, caesarean section is underused because of lack of facilities and trained personnel.1 In other developing countries such as ones in Latin America and eastern Asia, incidence is 30% of all births or higher, even though large sections of the population lack access to basic obstetric care, while in developed countries it has steadily risen to about 2025%.1 Despite such big differences between countries, the modifiable causes of rising caesarean section rates and what to do about them are unclear.
In this week's BMJ, a randomised controlled trial by Montgomery and colleagues looks at the effect of two computer based decision aids compared with usual care in pregnant women who have had a previous caesarean section.2 One aid provided structured
Jeremy A Lauer, economist1, Ana P Betrán, technical officer2
1 Health Systems Financing, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland, 2 Making Pregnancy Safer, World Health Organization
lauerj@who.int
Read all Rapid Responses