BMJ  2007;334:1249 (16 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39245.510718.59

Observations

Media watch

Why don't journalists mention the data?

Have stories about "electrosensitivity" simply been lifted from those promoting this new diagnosis?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Sometimes, as a doctor who also writes in the newspapers, a dark thought comes across me: wouldn't it be so refreshing—secretly, wouldn't it feel so free—to leave the medical thing behind, and just make stuff up, say what I want, spin any story that pleases me, or any story that sells, and gaily ignore the evidence?

For two years now the British news media has been promoting the existence of a new medical condition, called electrosensitivity, or electromagnetic hypersensitivity. The story—or in medical terms the hypothesis—is that a wide range of symptoms are caused by acute exposure to electromagnetic signals, and that these symptoms are ameliorated by this signal being removed.

The features have a lot in common with what might often conventionally be called "medically unexplained symptoms": tiredness, difficulty concentrating, headaches, nausea, bowel complaints, aches in the limbs, crawling sensations or pain in the skin, and more, for which . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Someone to watch over me

Elizabeth Loder
BMJ 2007 334: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Isolated "sell-me" stories

Neville W Goodman
bmj.com, 15 Jun 2007 [Full text]

Clinical Data on EMR Exposures

George L. Carlo
bmj.com, 17 Jun 2007 [Full text]

Not a new problem

Ian Pennell
bmj.com, 18 Jun 2007 [Full text]

Relevant data for ES studies

Michael Bevington
bmj.com, 18 Jun 2007 [Full text]

Why don't journalists mention the data?

Andrew Goldsworthy
bmj.com, 19 Jun 2007 [Full text]

blinkeredscience is badscience

Roderick Read
bmj.com, 20 Jun 2007 [Full text]

Provocation studies - a witches ducking stool?

Grahame K. Blackwell
bmj.com, 20 Jun 2007 [Full text]

Explaining away the inconvenient truths.

Peter J Flegg
bmj.com, 21 Jun 2007 [Full text]

Plenty of evidence

Sarah J Wright MA (Cantab)
bmj.com, 22 Jun 2007 [Full text]

Re: Explaining away the inconvenient truths.

Andrew Goldsworthy
bmj.com, 22 Jun 2007 [Full text]

Provocation studies are not the whole of the EMF literature

Graham Philips
bmj.com, 22 Jun 2007 [Full text]

Just who is being dismissive?

Austin C Elliott
bmj.com, 26 Jun 2007 [Full text]

Electrosensitivity Lobby? You bet.....

George L Carlo
bmj.com, 27 Jun 2007 [Full text]

Responding to hostility

Rod Read
bmj.com, 30 Jun 2007 [Full text]

Data, not anecdotes, please

Austin C Elliott
bmj.com, 1 Jul 2007 [Full text]

A Comment from an EHS Grandmother

Sandra L Lawrence
bmj.com, 3 Jul 2007 [Full text]

Journalists not using ALL the data,

Rod Read
bmj.com, 3 Jul 2007 [Full text]

More Hidden Dangers for the EHS

Sandra L Lawrence
bmj.com, 10 Jul 2007 [Full text]

Symptoms may be real, but is cause?

stephen black
bmj.com, 16 Jul 2007 [Full text]

EMF as DATA

James Chappèll
bmj.com, 7 Apr 2009 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>