Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:1115 (26 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39210.473264.59
Jerome P Kassirer, distinguished professor,
Tufts University School of Medicine, Medford, MA, USA
jerome.kassirer@tufts.edu
After decades of resistance, doctors must get over their reluctance to have their performance measured, finds Jerome Kassirer
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Americans were proud to claim that our healthcare system was the best in the worlduntil we discovered that it wasn't. Reports in the early 1990s that patient care was riddled with medical errors served as an important wake-up call, and within a few years we were scrambling to figure out what to do about it. The revelations that our life expectancy and child mortality were worse than in dozens of other countries added insult to injury, and the enormous variations in practice patterns across the country disclosed that medical practice was more like a lone cowboy mentality ("I do it my way, don't bother me with rules or requirements") than scientific practice. For years the only brakes on poor performance were malpractice suits, and they were heavy handed, inadequate governors of practice. But the error mongers spawned evidence based medicine, which in turn begat clinical practice guidelines, a spate of
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?