BMJ 2007;334:1112-1113 (26 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39204.531586.AD
Practice
NICE guidelines
Secondary prevention for patients after a myocardial infarction: summary of NICE guidance
J S Skinner, consultant community cardiologist1,
A Cooper, senior health services research fellow2,
G S Feder, professor of primary care research and development3
1 Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP,
2 National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care, Royal College of General Practitioners, London,
3 Barts and the London Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, London
Correspondence to: J S Skinner Jane.Skinner@nuth.nhs.uk
This is one of a series of BMJ summaries of new NICE guidelines, which are based on the best available evidence; they will highlight important recommendations for clinical practice, especially where uncertainty or controversy exists.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Why read this summary?
Although premature mortality from coronary heart disease in
the United Kingdom has fallen since the 1970s, it remains higher
than in most other Western countries. After an acute myocardial
infarction, many eligible patients are prescribed aspirin,
blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and statins.
Not everyone, however, is offered the most effective secondary
prevention
1 2that is, all four of these drugs or other
effective drugsnor does everyone receive lifestyle advice
and cardiac rehabilitation. This article summarises the most
recent recommendations from the National Institute for Health
and Clinical Excellence (NICE) on effective secondary prevention
in patients after myocardial infarction.
3 The detailed consideration
of the evidence is available in the full guideline (www.nice.org.uk/CG048).
Recommendations
NICE recommendations are based on systematic reviews of best
available evidence. For the guidance on secondary prevention
for patients after a myocardial infarction, in cases where minimal
evidence was available, the guideline development group developed
the recommendations
. . . [Full text of this article]
Overcoming barriers

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation
- Rick Goud, Nicolette F de Keizer, Gerben ter Riet, Jeremy C Wyatt, Arie Hasman, Irene M Hellemans, and Niels Peek
BMJ 2009 338: b1440.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
We help treat acute coronary syndromes
- Hasnain M Dalal
BMJ 2007 334: 1336.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Goud, R., de Keizer, N. F, ter Riet, G., Wyatt, J. C, Hasman, A., Hellemans, I. M, Peek, N.
(2009). Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation. BMJ
338: b1440-b1440
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Starfield, B, Hyde, J, Gervas, J, Heath, I
(2008). The concept of prevention: a good idea gone astray?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
62: 580-583
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Skinner, J S, Cooper, A, Feder, G S, on behalf of the Guideline Development Group,
(2007). Secondary prevention for patients following a myocardial infarction: summary of NICE guidance. Heart
93: 862-864
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Dalal, H. M
(2007). We help treat acute coronary syndromes. BMJ
334: 1336-1336
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- more evidence is required before following NICE guidelines on coprescription of aspirin and warfarin
- oscar,m jolobe, et al.
bmj.com, 25 May 2007
[Full text]
- Coronary heart disease support groups can help post-MI patients to follow NICE guidance in the long-term
- Lisa C Hanna, et al.
bmj.com, 29 May 2007
[Full text]
- Offfering choice could improve the uptake of cardiac rehabilitation
- Hasnain M Dalal, et al.
bmj.com, 1 Jun 2007
[Full text]
- Screening for Cardiovascular Risk
- David J Thomson, et al.
bmj.com, 13 Jul 2007
[Full text]