Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:1083-1085 (26 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39206.389711.AD
Jonathan Gornall, freelance journalist
London
Jgornall@mac.com
Concerns over the prosecutions of Angela Cannings, Sally Clark, and Trupti Patel have led to wide ranging reforms to the way unexplained infant deaths are handled. Jonathan Gornall describes how the reforms should make a difficult situation less traumatic for both parents and professionals
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
"They came at dawn. Two police cars, full of officers, brake in front of Hope Cottage in Wilmslow. Sally is in the kitchen in her dressing gown. There is a knock at the front door ..."
This is how John Batt, a solicitor who was part of Sally Clark's legal team, recorded the moment almost 10 years ago when her already shattered world collided with what was then the harsh reality of the investigation of sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) in England and Wales.1 Much has happened since Mrs Clark's arrest in 1998 for the murder of her two infant sons, Christopher and Harry: her imprisonment in November 1999, the failure of her first appeal in October 2000, her successful appeal in January 2003, and, on 16 March this year, her own death.2 The consequences of Mrs Clark's case, devastating for her family, have also been far reaching for
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?